In August 2024, Shannon Sharpe addressed Noah Lyles’ comments regarding the use of “world champion” by athletes in sports that are not traditionally global.
Lyles, an American sprinter and World Athletics Championship gold medalist, criticized athletes from sports like American football and basketball for calling themselves “world champions” despite competing primarily in the U.S.
Sharpe, known for his outspoken commentary, didn’t hold back in his response. He criticized Lyles for his narrow perspective, emphasizing that American football and basketball have significant global followings, with international players making substantial impacts in these leagues.
Sharpe argued that while track and field is a global sport, it’s not the only one that garners worldwide attention and acclaim.
Sharpe pointed out the irony in Lyles’ stance, suggesting that his comments displayed a form of elitism and ignorance regarding the broader appeal and global reach of different sports.
He emphasized that every sport has its own way of branding its champions and that the term “world champion” is used to denote the pinnacle of achievement in that specific field, regardless of where the sport is predominantly played.
In summary, Sharpe’s critique was a mix of pointing out Lyles’ myopic view and defending the legitimacy of achievements in various sports.
Sharpe underscored that each sport has its own global significance, and the use of “world champion” should be seen in context rather than dismissed outright.